Got 99 characters code with lambda, but can't even imagine how to shorten it to 58 of a best solution. So my question is about range looping - is there any shorter way to loop through a range than 'a for a in range(x,y)' - this construction takes up quite a bit of space now.
Created at: 2015/04/18 18:26; Updated at: 2015/04/19 19:38